Why Locations Underperform

What should you look for in a franchise site selection partner?

Most location underperformance is predictable and diagnosable. Understanding whether the issue is the market, the site, the economics, or the operator is the first step toward an effective response.

Common Questions & Answers

A franchise site selection partner should provide a predictive model built from your own portfolio data, a process that identifies sites before they reach the listing market, a salaried team with no commission incentive to close, and full execution from site search through lease negotiation. The most important signal is whether they start with your performance data or with available inventory.

Why It Matters

Most site selection services start where space is available. That process will always produce a wide distribution of outcomes because availability is a landlord variable, not a brand performance variable. A partner who starts from your data will narrow that distribution toward your best-performing locations.

Key Factors

  • Custom model: built from your performance data, not generic industry benchmarks
  • Incentive alignment: salaried advisors versus commission-based brokers
  • Proactive sourcing: approaching landlords before listings go public
  • Full execution: site search through lease negotiation in one engagement
  • Track record: can they demonstrate location-level outcomes for comparable brands?

The Windsor Perspective

Windsor's entire model was designed around these criteria. Every Windsor consultant is salaried. Every engagement starts with a Location DNA model built from the client's portfolio. And Windsor approaches every target market proactively, not by browsing listing platforms.

0 bad sites
Every Windsor-supported Alloy Personal Training studio has opened strong since 2019. Zero bad locations across 75%+ of the portfolio. Franchisees hit profitability faster than projected — and Windsor's predictive process became a selling point in franchise development.

A commission-based broker earns compensation when a lease is signed. A salaried advisor earns compensation regardless of whether a site is approved. The commission structure creates a financial incentive to close transactions. Even when the data does not support a site. The salaried structure creates an incentive to get the decision right.

Why It Matters

Franchise brands often discover this misalignment after the fact — when a location underperforms and the broker who recommended it has moved on to the next transaction. The incentive structure is the single most predictive variable in whether your site selection process will say no when no is the right answer.

Key Factors

  • Commission-based: compensated per closed transaction, incentive runs toward approval
  • Salaried: compensated on engagement, incentive runs toward brand performance
  • Commission brokers typically lack visibility into how similar sites performed across your system
  • Salaried advisors are more likely to identify and recommend walking away from weak sites
  • National salaried teams provide consistency across markets; local brokers vary by geography

The Windsor Perspective

Windsor operates exclusively on a salaried model. Windsor advisors are the only team in the site approval process with a financial incentive to say no when the data does not support a site.

Ask how they build their recommendations, from your data or from market availability. Ask whether advisors earn commissions on closed leases. Ask them to name a location they recommended against and explain why. Ask what their process looks like in a market where they have no existing broker relationships. Ask how they would score a specific candidate site before any property is toured.

Why It Matters

These questions reveal the underlying structure of how the firm operates. A firm that cannot answer them with specifics — or responds with vague references to relationships and market knowledge — is likely a transactional operation. A firm with a rigorous answer to each one has built a repeatable process.

Key Factors

  • How do you build recommendations, from our data or from available inventory?
  • Are your advisors salaried or commission-based?
  • Can you walk me through a site you recommended against, and why?
  • How does your process work in a new market where you have no existing relationships?
  • How do you predict whether a specific site will perform for our brand?
  • What brands comparable to ours have you worked with, and what were the outcomes?

The Windsor Perspective

Windsor welcomes every one of these questions. The answers are straightforward: predictive model from client data, salaried advisors, proactive outreach not limited to listed inventory, and a documented track record of zero bad locations across the Alloy Personal Training portfolio.

A brand should engage a site selection partner when it has enough locations to build a predictive model — typically 15 to 20 open units. Is planning to accelerate openings. The earlier a performance model is built, the more openings it can influence. Waiting until a brand has 50 locations means 35 openings happened without the benefit of a data-driven process.

Why It Matters

Early engagement produces compounding value. Every opening that performs well improves the model and raises system average unit volume, which makes franchise development easier, strengthens FDD disclosures, and improves franchisee validation — all of which accelerate the next wave of growth.

Key Factors

  • 15 to 20 open locations is typically sufficient to build a meaningful predictive model
  • Engagement should precede the next development cycle, not follow it
  • Earlier engagement means more openings benefit from the data-driven process
  • The model improves as more locations open — long-term engagements produce better outcomes than project-by-project work
  • For brands earlier than 15 locations, foundational criteria development is still valuable

The Windsor Perspective

Windsor works with brands at different stages, from those building their first model at 20 locations to PE-backed brands managing portfolios of 200. The process adapts to the portfolio size, but the principle is the same: start with what your data shows about your best locations, not with what is available in the market.

Windsor Group

Ready to close your location growth gaps?

Book a Windsor Strategy Session and see how predictive site selection and location growth advisory can move your score. Your system AUV.

See the Windsor Way Overview
Book a Windsor Strategy Session

Loading calendar…